...make a peep

An official blog of Lunchpail Books... helping early readers get excited about reading! We provide vocabulary appropriate and FUN books for the early reader (K-3). Our books are carefully crafted to entice beginner
Showing posts with label 儿童图书,孩子书,读. Show all posts
Showing posts with label 儿童图书,孩子书,读. Show all posts

Sunday, June 20, 2010

The Moral of the Story

Seems like just about every topic of for children’s book has been covered.  What’s left to write about?  Are we near the end of ideas? Here in this blog, I have mentioned farting dogs, stepping in poo and variety of popular adolescent topics.  However, how important is it to have a “moral to the story?”  Should a message be straightforward or more subversively addressed?  Should there be a message at all?

Are there messages (morals) in our popular folklore?  How about “The Three Little Pigs?”  Aren’t we admonished to plan ahead and work hard…then bad things will pass by?   In a similarly themed fable “The Ants and the Grasshopper”, has a similar message about the benefits of hard work; but in this case adds the complexity of mercy and redemption.  Get’s kind of heavy!

What about my hero Dr. Seuss?   Surely he didn’t subversively preach us a message… or did he?
Did the great Seuss approach politically sensitive issues?

Many of Geisel's books are thought to express his views on a myriad of social and political issues: The Lorax (1971), about environmentalism and anti-consumerism; The Sneetches (1961), about racial equality; The Butter Battle Book (1984), about the arms race; Yertle the Turtle (1958), about anti-fascism and anti-authoritarianism; How the Grinch Stole Christmas! (1957), about anti-materialism; and Horton Hears a Who! (1954), about anti-isolationism and internationalism. Shortly before the end of the 1972–1974 Watergate scandal, in which United States president Richard Nixon resigned, Geisel converted one of his famous children's books into a polemic. "Richard M. Nixon, Will You Please Go Now!" was published in major newspapers through the column of his friend Art Buchwald.

Although Geisel never made any explicit or implicit mention of the abortion debate in his books, the line "A person's a person, no matter how small!!" from Horton Hears a Who! has grown, over the objections of his widow, into widespread use on the pro-life side of the issue.

So, back to my point… would we be better off having stories with no moral value other than that they are just fun… sort of like “Archie” or “Beetle Bailey”… is reading for the sake of reading or for practice a good reason to read?   Would it be better to read the ingredients of our favorite breakfast cereal (Wow 12% sugar!)?  Or perhaps good story telling on it’s own is adequate reason for a story to exist.   If they are reading, and enjoying the activity…that’s fine right?

What are your thoughts?  Should Children’s Books teach a message (have a morale)…If so what kind of message?  Where do we draw the line on appropriate and inappropriate messages?  Is it OK if it is buried deep?  Dr. Seuss viewed his own work as “Subversive as hell.”

Monday, May 31, 2010

关于Johnnie Lunchpail

因为我可以记住我爱讲故事。 我也爱阅读书并且吞食了作者,特别是children'博士Suess和其他著名; s书作者! 今天,我仍然爱及早坐下与经典之作读者…,但是我也爱写! 我写了并且组成了在纽约执行的二Off-Off Broadway生产。 另外,写了十二儿童的歌曲和偶尔地执行,当乞求。 我妻子和我培养了9个孩子(5个女孩, 4个男孩) -如此, I' ve有许多与不同的年龄的实践,并且兴趣和许多机会讲故事或手表故事在某些情况下出现! 我写了关于许多这些做父母的冒险在我的书“5态度做父母”可利用在Amazon.com。 读书总是我们的家庭生活的一个重要部分和,虽然孩子增长,我仍然想要与幼儿分享读的兴奋。 他们是否感觉独自地读书的兴奋或是读的对书是凉快的! -他们扩展我们的视觉和想象力。 当孩子是小的,我们在有各种各样的动物的一个微型农场居住包括鸭子! 鸭子总是我们的喜爱-- 逗人喜爱,模糊,富冒险和快派出友好的“窥视窥视”。 我希望您和您的家庭将享受关于我们说出“窥视窥视的”喜爱的鸭子的故事。 注意很快来的新书! 恳切地, 作者,
Johnnie Lunchpail